🔗 Share this article

When dawn crept over the Amazonian city of Belém on Saturday morning, delegates remained trapped in a airless conference room, oblivious whether it was day or night. They had been 12 hours in tense discussions, with numerous ministers representing various coalitions of countries from the least developed nations to the most developed economies.

Patience wore thin, the air stifling as sweaty delegates acknowledged the harsh reality: they were unlikely to achieve a comprehensive agreement in Brazil. The international climate negotiations hovered near the brink of total collapse.

The major obstacle: Fossil fuels

Research has demonstrated for nearly a century, the carbon dioxide produced by utilizing fossil fuels is increasing temperatures on our planet to critical levels.

Yet, during over three decades of annual climate meetings, the essential necessity to stop fossil fuel use has been referenced only once – in a resolution made two years ago at Cop28 to "shift from fossil fuels". Representatives from the Gulf states, Russia, and multiple other countries were resolved this would not happen again.

Increasing pressure for change

Meanwhile, a increasing coalition of countries were just as committed that movement on this issue was vitally needed. They had created a plan that was earning expanding support and made it evident they were ready to stand their ground.

Less wealthy nations urgently needed to move forward on securing economic resources to help them cope with the growing impacts of environmental crises.

Critical moment

In the pre-dawn period of Saturday, some delegates were prepared to withdraw and force a collapse. "We were close for us," remarked one national delegate. "I considered to walk away."

The breakthrough happened through negotiations with Saudi Arabia. Around 6am, key negotiators left the main group to hold a confidential discussion with the head Saudi negotiator. They encouraged text that would indirectly acknowledge the global commitment to "shift from fossil fuels" made two years earlier in Dubai.

Unexpected agreement

As opposed to explicitly mentioning fossil fuels, the text would refer to "the Dubai agreement". Upon deliberation, the Saudi delegation surprisingly approved the wording.

Participants collapsed into relief. Applause rang out. The deal was finalized.

With what became known as the "Belém political package", the world took a modest advance towards the gradual elimination of fossil fuels – a hesitant, inadequate step that will scarcely affect the climate's steady march towards disaster. But nevertheless a notable change from complete stagnation.

Major components of the agreement

• Complementing the indirect reference in the official document, countries will commence creating a roadmap to gradually eliminate fossil fuels
• This will be largely a optional undertaking led by Brazil that will provide updates next year
• Addressing the essential decreases in greenhouse gas emissions to stay within the 1.5C limit was similarly postponed to next year
• Developing countries secured a tripling to $120bn of yearly funding to help them manage the impacts of environmental crises
• This amount will not be completely provided until 2035
• Workers will benefit from a "equitable change process" to help people working in fossil fuel sectors transition to the clean economy

Differing opinions

As the world approaches the brink of climate "irreversible changes" that could eliminate habitats and plunge whole regions into disorder, the agreement was not the "significant advancement" needed.

"Negotiators delivered some small advances in the right direction, but in light of the scale of the climate crisis, it has failed to rise to the occasion," cautioned one environmental analyst.

This flawed deal might have been the maximum achievable, given the international tensions – including a Washington administration who ignored the talks and remains aligned with oil and coal, the growing influence of conservative movements, continuing wars in different locations, intolerable levels of inequality, and global economic uncertainty.

"Major polluters – the oil and gas companies – were at last in the spotlight at these negotiations," notes one environmental advocate. "This represents progress on that. The platform is open. Now we must transform it into a actual pathway to a protected environment."

Major disagreements revealed

Even as nations were able to welcome the official adoption of the deal, Cop30 also exposed major disagreements in the only global process for tackling the climate crisis.

"UN negotiations are agreement-dependent, and in a era of global disagreements, agreement is increasingly difficult to reach," stated one global leader. "I cannot pretend that Cop30 has achieved complete success that is needed. The difference between present circumstances and what evidence necessitates remains dangerously wide."

When the world is to avert the gravest consequences of climate crisis, the global discussions alone will fall far short.